Peoria, AZ•21,920 annual services
Frequent Service: Low osmolar contrast material, 300-399 mg/ml iodine concentration, per ml(13222 procedures/year)
3.05x
Markup vs Standard
State Directory
Radiation Oncology in Arizona
Compare verified clinical procedure counts, typical visit durations, and fair pricing ratings for Radiation Oncology practitioners across Arizona.
View Profile →
Scottsdale, AZ•21,062 annual services
Frequent Service: Lutetium lu 177 vipivotide tetraxetan, therapeutic, 1 millicurie(17902 procedures/year)
2.08x
Markup vs Standard
Green Valley, AZ•18,219 annual services
Frequent Service: Low osmolar contrast material, 300-399 mg/ml iodine concentration, per ml(12365 procedures/year)
3.11x
Markup vs Standard
Gilbert, AZ•18,080 annual services
Frequent Service: Lutetium lu 177 vipivotide tetraxetan, therapeutic, 1 millicurie(7376 procedures/year)
2.58x
Markup vs Standard
Tucson, AZ•15,884 annual services
Frequent Service: Low osmolar contrast material, 300-399 mg/ml iodine concentration, per ml(10730 procedures/year)
3.18x
Markup vs Standard
Tempe, AZ•14,678 annual services
Frequent Service: Low osmolar contrast material, 300-399 mg/ml iodine concentration, per ml(9700 procedures/year)
3.33x
Markup vs Standard
Peoria, AZ•10,575 annual services
Frequent Service: Low osmolar contrast material, 300-399 mg/ml iodine concentration, per ml(4945 procedures/year)
3.31x
Markup vs Standard
Mesa, AZ•9,847 annual services
Frequent Service: Ct guidance for insertion of radiation therapy fields(2517 procedures/year)
2.4x
Markup vs Standard
Chandler, AZ•9,469 annual services
Frequent Service: Ct guidance for insertion of radiation therapy fields(2787 procedures/year)
2.44x
Markup vs Standard
Prescott, AZ•8,728 annual services
Frequent Service: Intensity modulated treatment delivery, single or multiple fields/arcs,via narrow spatially and temporally modulated beams, binary, dynamic mlc, per treatment session(1751 procedures/year)
5.79x
Markup vs Standard
Chandler, AZ•7,859 annual services
Frequent Service: Intensity modulated treatment delivery, single or multiple fields/arcs,via narrow spatially and temporally modulated beams, binary, dynamic mlc, per treatment session(2127 procedures/year)
2.35x
Markup vs Standard
Phoenix, AZ•7,687 annual services
Frequent Service: Intensity modulated treatment delivery, single or multiple fields/arcs,via narrow spatially and temporally modulated beams, binary, dynamic mlc, per treatment session(2959 procedures/year)
6.83x
Markup vs Standard
Scottsdale, AZ•7,362 annual services
Frequent Service: Low osmolar contrast material, 300-399 mg/ml iodine concentration, per ml(2951 procedures/year)
3.4x
Markup vs Standard
Phoenix, AZ•7,156 annual services
Frequent Service: Low osmolar contrast material, 300-399 mg/ml iodine concentration, per ml(2725 procedures/year)
3.51x
Markup vs Standard
Phoenix, AZ•7,093 annual services
Frequent Service: Low osmolar contrast material, 300-399 mg/ml iodine concentration, per ml(3400 procedures/year)
2.99x
Markup vs Standard
Glendale, AZ•7,067 annual services
Frequent Service: Ct guidance for insertion of radiation therapy fields(1578 procedures/year)
2.35x
Markup vs Standard
Tucson, AZ•7,021 annual services
Frequent Service: Intensity modulated treatment delivery, single or multiple fields/arcs,via narrow spatially and temporally modulated beams, binary, dynamic mlc, per treatment session(2624 procedures/year)
6.73x
Markup vs Standard
Glendale, AZ•6,989 annual services
Frequent Service: Low osmolar contrast material, 300-399 mg/ml iodine concentration, per ml(1725 procedures/year)
3.44x
Markup vs Standard
Mesa, AZ•6,053 annual services
Frequent Service: Ct guidance for insertion of radiation therapy fields(1478 procedures/year)
2.41x
Markup vs Standard
Tucson, AZ•5,884 annual services
Frequent Service: Low osmolar contrast material, 300-399 mg/ml iodine concentration, per ml(2033 procedures/year)
3.11x
Markup vs Standard
Scottsdale, AZ•5,432 annual services
Frequent Service: Ct guidance for insertion of radiation therapy fields(1252 procedures/year)
3.52x
Markup vs Standard
Glendale, AZ•5,324 annual services
Frequent Service: Ct guidance for insertion of radiation therapy fields(1435 procedures/year)
4.26x
Markup vs Standard
Phoenix, AZ•5,013 annual services
Frequent Service: Ct guidance for insertion of radiation therapy fields(979 procedures/year)
4.14x
Markup vs Standard
Scottsdale, AZ•4,959 annual services
Frequent Service: Ct guidance for insertion of radiation therapy fields(1151 procedures/year)
2.33x
Markup vs Standard
Mesa, AZ•4,933 annual services
Frequent Service: Ct guidance for insertion of radiation therapy fields(1210 procedures/year)
2.33x
Markup vs Standard
Scottsdale, AZ•4,882 annual services
Frequent Service: Ct guidance for insertion of radiation therapy fields(1520 procedures/year)
2.09x
Markup vs Standard
Scottsdale, AZ•4,874 annual services
Frequent Service: Intensity modulated treatment delivery, single or multiple fields/arcs,via narrow spatially and temporally modulated beams, binary, dynamic mlc, per treatment session(1669 procedures/year)
6.52x
Markup vs Standard
Tucson, AZ•4,857 annual services
Frequent Service: Low osmolar contrast material, 300-399 mg/ml iodine concentration, per ml(1627 procedures/year)
3.26x
Markup vs Standard
Phoenix, AZ•4,742 annual services
Frequent Service: Ct guidance for insertion of radiation therapy fields(1058 procedures/year)
3.54x
Markup vs Standard
Glendale, AZ•4,344 annual services
Frequent Service: Ct guidance for insertion of radiation therapy fields(963 procedures/year)
2.35x
Markup vs Standard
Glendale, AZ•4,235 annual services
Frequent Service: Low osmolar contrast material, 300-399 mg/ml iodine concentration, per ml(2300 procedures/year)
4.58x
Markup vs Standard
Phoenix, AZ•4,108 annual services
Frequent Service: Ct guidance for insertion of radiation therapy fields(633 procedures/year)
3.03x
Markup vs Standard
Prescott, AZ•4,016 annual services
Frequent Service: Intensity modulated treatment delivery, single or multiple fields/arcs,via narrow spatially and temporally modulated beams, binary, dynamic mlc, per treatment session(817 procedures/year)
5.51x
Markup vs Standard
Sierra Vista, AZ•3,976 annual services
Frequent Service: Ct guidance for insertion of radiation therapy fields(1233 procedures/year)
2.66x
Markup vs Standard
Tucson, AZ•3,934 annual services
Frequent Service: Intensity modulated treatment delivery, single or multiple fields/arcs,via narrow spatially and temporally modulated beams, binary, dynamic mlc, per treatment session(547 procedures/year)
5.13x
Markup vs Standard
Tucson, AZ•3,932 annual services
Frequent Service: Intensity modulated treatment delivery, single or multiple fields/arcs,via narrow spatially and temporally modulated beams, binary, dynamic mlc, per treatment session(709 procedures/year)
5.17x
Markup vs Standard
Tucson, AZ•3,914 annual services
Frequent Service: Intensity modulated treatment delivery, single or multiple fields/arcs,via narrow spatially and temporally modulated beams, binary, dynamic mlc, per treatment session(762 procedures/year)
5.46x
Markup vs Standard
Tucson, AZ•3,904 annual services
Frequent Service: Intensity modulated treatment delivery, single or multiple fields/arcs,via narrow spatially and temporally modulated beams, binary, dynamic mlc, per treatment session(652 procedures/year)
5.01x
Markup vs Standard
Peoria, AZ•3,894 annual services
Frequent Service: Ct guidance for insertion of radiation therapy fields(918 procedures/year)
3.18x
Markup vs Standard
Phoenix, AZ•3,737 annual services
Frequent Service: Ct guidance for insertion of radiation therapy fields(967 procedures/year)
3.99x
Markup vs Standard